Share This Story
Recently, Dean Leesui, Neil Gray and I sat for a panel conversation with Rich Washington on the topic of what makes a business genuinely investible. Not fundable. Investible. And the gap between the two.
A founder can walk into a room with real traction, a compelling story, and a product that works, and still leave without a term sheet. Not because the vision was wrong, but because the investor could see, underneath the pitch, that the business wasn’t built to hold the weight of the money it was asking for.
Investors aren’t just betting on where you’re going. They’re evaluating whether you can get there without falling apart along the way.
The gap between fundable and investible
Fundable is the pitch. The market size, the traction, the story of where this goes.
Investible is what’s underneath it: whether the operations, the workflow, the systems can absorb growth instead of buckling under it.
That’s execution risk, and it’s exactly what sophisticated investors are digging for once the pitch is over. Product and vision get you in the room. What happens next depends on whether the business underneath can scale.
I’ve watched this play out from the operations side more times than I can count. A business scales too early, before the foundation is ready, and the strain that used to live quietly with the founder spreads across the entire company. What was one person’s manageable load becomes everyone’s problem, all at once.
AI doesn’t fix a broken process. It speeds it up.
This is the part of the conversation that stuck with me most. There’s a real temptation right now to treat AI as the fix for operational strain – layer it on, and the friction disappears.
It doesn’t work that way. AI amplifies whatever is already there. Hand it a broken process, and it won’t quietly smooth things over. It will break that process faster, and at a scale you didn’t have before.
The businesses that get real value from AI are the ones who did the unglamorous work first: mapping how things run, cleaning up the workflow, making the decisions clear before automating any part of them. Skip that step, and the technology just becomes a faster way to compound the same underlying strain.
Operational maturity has a number attached to it
Here’s the part that tends to land hardest with owners who think of operations as a cost center rather than an asset: operational maturity can add somewhere in the range of 12 to 15% to the value of a business. That’s not a soft, feel-good benefit. That’s a number a buyer or investor puts directly into their model.
It shows up again with talent. The strongest candidates aren’t just evaluating your product or your offer anymore. They’re evaluating your processes before they say yes. People who’ve been part of well-run organizations can tell, often within the first few conversations, whether they’d be walking into clarity or into strain. And the best ones are choosing accordingly.
What being investible looks like
It looks like a business where the workflow doesn’t depend on any one person’s memory. Where a new hire, an investor doing diligence, or a technology layer can look at how things run and find something coherent, not a patchwork of workarounds held together by good intentions.
It’s not about being big. Plenty of small, tightly run businesses are more investible than companies twice their size, because the person evaluating them can see the operational maturity holding everything together.
Organize the business. Optimize how it runs. That’s what makes the growth, and the investment, sustainable once it arrives.
If you’re thinking about what your own operations would show an investor, a buyer, or your next great hire, I’d welcome a conversation.
See the full episode here.
🎙️ Guests:
Dean Leesui — Fractional CIO: https://www.linkedin.com/in/deanleesui/
Deanne Kelleher — Operations & Workflow: https://www.linkedin.com/in/deannekelleher/
Neil Gray — Sales & Marketing: https://www.linkedin.com/in/neilsgray/
🎙️ Host: Richard Washington — Founder, Tick Talent
🔗 Connect with Rich: https://www.linkedin.com/in/richwash/
🌐 Tick Talent: https://www.tick-talent.com/
The gap between where you are and where you want to be is rarely about effort. It’s about having the right systems and the right support to get there.
If continuous improvement feels like a priority but nobody owns it yet, that’s a great place to start a conversation.
Recover time. Recapture revenue. Build systems that scale.
About KAOS Group
There comes a point in every growing organization where operations can’t quite keep up with ambition. Work gets done – but not always consistently. Knowledge lives in people rather than systems. And growth starts to feel harder than it should because everything still runs through the same handful of people.
That’s the work we do at KAOS Group.
Through our Organize. Optimize. Profit. methodology, we work with owners, leaders, and stakeholders to build the behind-the-scenes systems that let businesses scale, sell, or run without depending on any one person.
This is where you come in.
The best working relationships start with a real conversation. Let’s connect over a complimentary 25-minute call – get to know each other and explore whether working together makes sense.
No agenda. Simply a conversation.
The most valuable businesses run, grow, and sell on the strength of their systems — not the memory of their people.
Deanne Kelleher, Founder and Principal of KAOS Group, builds and implements the behind-the-scenes systems that turn operational complexity into scalable, transferable operations – recovering time, recapturing revenue, and freeing businesses to grow, scale, or sell on their own terms.
Organize. Optimize. Profit.